Talk:Version response: Difference between revisions
From OPeNDAP Documentation
⧼opendap2-jumptonavigation⧽
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Why the condensed form? It's easier to read and holds virtually all the same information. Most 'users' of this will be people, like us, trying to debug a server and interested in the versions of software it includes. For users that are machines, it's easy to write a SAX parser (or use a simple string search) to find the DAP protocol number. | Why the condensed form? It's easier to read and holds virtually all the same information. Most 'users' of this will be people, like us, trying to debug a server and interested in the versions of software it includes. For users that are machines, it's easy to write a SAX parser (or use a simple string search) to find the DAP protocol number. | ||
''Notes'': | '''Notes''': | ||
# The order of the elements at the top-level doesn't matter, so the top-level enclosing element has been removed. | # The order of the elements at the top-level doesn't matter, so the top-level enclosing element has been removed. | ||
# The DAP protocol included is the highest version only - most clients will not parse this looking for version numbers since client writers rarely do that stuff and servers SHOULD provide backwards compatibility. In the worst case, a server that advertises DAP 3.2 will return Error responses for a client that says it can only understand a lower version of the DAP (e.g., 2.0). | # The DAP protocol included is the highest version only - most clients will not parse this looking for version numbers since client writers rarely do that stuff and servers SHOULD provide backwards compatibility. In the worst case, a server that advertises DAP 3.2 will return Error responses for a client that says it can only understand a lower version of the DAP (e.g., 2.0). | ||
Revision as of 22:24, 29 July 2008
I think the DAP 3.1 Version response XML should be changes to look like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Hyrax version="1.4.0"/>
<DAP version="3.2"/> <!-- Only show the highest version -->
<BES version="3.6.2" name="bes" prefix"/">
<module name="hdf4_handler" version="3.7.9"/>
<module name="netcdf_handler" version="3.7.8"/>
...
</BES>
<OLFS version="1.4.0"/>
Why the condensed form? It's easier to read and holds virtually all the same information. Most 'users' of this will be people, like us, trying to debug a server and interested in the versions of software it includes. For users that are machines, it's easy to write a SAX parser (or use a simple string search) to find the DAP protocol number.
Notes:
- The order of the elements at the top-level doesn't matter, so the top-level enclosing element has been removed.
- The DAP protocol included is the highest version only - most clients will not parse this looking for version numbers since client writers rarely do that stuff and servers SHOULD provide backwards compatibility. In the worst case, a server that advertises DAP 3.2 will return Error responses for a client that says it can only understand a lower version of the DAP (e.g., 2.0).
