Difference between revisions of "MergingBranches"
(→Merging from Branches Using only working copies of code)
|Line 21:||Line 21:|
Here's what it looks like in practice:
Here's what it looks like in practice:
Revision as of 21:03, 14 February 2014
- 1 How to Merge Code with SVN
- 2 General pattern for branch development
- 3 Merging from Branches Using only working copies of code
- 4 Merging process with only the destination code checked out
- 5 Minor fixes once code has been tagged but before an official release
- 6 Errors
1 How to Merge Code with SVN
First, here are some references that might be useful. Get a copy of the SVN 1.5 documentation. Google it. Also, this blog entry has some very good information on one problem that you can run into with the --reintegrate option: http://blogs.open.collab.net/svn/2008/07/subversion-merg.html
2 General pattern for branch development
When working on a new feature, do the development on a branch unless the new feature is very simple addition that is unlikely to affect other code (e.g., reading a new parameter from the .dodsrc file).
To work on a branch periodically merge the trunk back to the branch so that the branch will have the small fixes and changes that are being made to the trunk. This keeps the changes on the branch focused on the new feature and that will simplify the eventual merge of that branch back to the trunk.
When you're done with the new feature, do one last merge of the trunk to the branch and then merge the branch to the trunk using the 'merge --reintegrate' command.
3 Merging from Branches Using only working copies of code
Experience has shown that this is a more reliable way to merge with SVN.
Another way to handle the sequence of events that takes place with managing a release on branch is to use SVN's 'merge from a working copy feature.' To do this, first have both the trunk and branch software checked out, updated and committed - that is, have two working copies that are identical to the HEAD revision of the trunk and the branch, respectively. In the branch working copy (WC) merge the trunk code to the branch. Once this works, you can check in the result to the branch or you can wait and see how the next merge operation goes before checking it in (it's best to check in the results of the merge in the branch WC unless it's really broken, but it is not necessary to do it before merging the branch WC to the trunk). Then in the trunk WC, merge the branch WC into the trunk WC. Once this works, check that in. The advantage of this is that you can do both merges before checking in the results.
Here's what it looks like in practice:
cd $trunk svn up svn ci cd $branch svn up svn ci svn merge [--dry-run] $trunk # In the directory $branch, run merge with the $trunk directory as its argument # Now make sure $branch builds/works # This directory ($branch, the svn branch WC) now contains the result of merging the $trunk code to the $branch code cd $trunk svn merge [--dry-run] $branch # In the $trunk directory, run merge with the $branch directory as its argument # Make sure this code builds/works # This (svn trunk WC) now contains the merge of the differences between the $branch code and this code svn ci # Check in the code in $trunk to svn's trunk cd $branch svn ci # Check in the code in $branch to svn's branch
4 Merging process with only the destination code checked out
Although this is should be no more or less hard than the above, experience says it's more error-prone than the above technique.
Here's the process I used to actually perform a merge from the trunk to a branch:
- In a copy of the trunk:
- check in. This makes sure you don't have anything outstanding in your working copy of the trunk. Of course, other people should do this too. It's probably not 100% necessary, but it cuts down on the confusion when things go awry.
- In a copy of the branch:
- check in. This means that the code in your working copy is the same as the code at the HEAD of the branch.
- merge the trunk to the branch. For example: `svn merge --accept postpone $svn/trunk/libdap`. The postpone argument tells svn to write conflicts in the source and you'll fix them up later.
- resolve the conflicts. You can find all the conflicted files using `svn status | grep '^C'`. Regarding resolving conflicts, there's no easy way to sort it out. When a merge generates a conflict the result is ... a mess. Well, OK, not always. Often it is just a comment or something but sometimes you need to look at the various different versions and edit the file to be something entirely new. The Trac code browser is really useful for looking at different versions of the code.
- mark the conflicts as resolved. `svn resolved <files>` [mjohnson: svn 1.6.5 suggests using `svn resolve --accept working` over resolved]
- build and test the code before you check it in. Be sure to clean out everything and run autoreconf, configure --prefix=$prefix, ... as you do these. I found the BES to be very sensitive to older libraries. In the end since I have both branch and trunk code installing into its own prefix I just removed the bin, lib, ..., directories. they were populated with new stuff as I ran make install.
- check in the result of the merge.
- Now move back to the trunk and run `merge --reintegrate $svn/branch/...`. If there are no changes added between the two merge operations there should be no conflicts during the reintegrate merge. However, ...
For merges of several related projects, I did all of them up to the point where I would check in the result of the merge so I could test the ensemble before saving the result.
5 Minor fixes once code has been tagged but before an official release
Assumption: You're using a SVN 1.5 or greater client.
If a small set of changes, for example, to the RPM build process, is needed after the source code has been tagged, then check those changes into the tag. If these changes affect the dependencies of other packages, do not do this. If these changes are going to require changes in other packages, make them to the release branch, tags that with a new version and release. Also, if more than just a very few lines needs to be changed, it should really be checked into the branch and tagged with a new version.
Since at this point the release branch will have been merged back to the trunk already, add the new changes first to the tag and then merge that tag back to the trunk. Use:
svn merge --dry-run $svn/tags/<component>/<version>
in the trunk directory. If the dry run looks like its doing what you expect, then go ahead with the merge. If not, you probably should have put these changes on the branch and made a new version for release. Back the changes out of the tag and make a new tag, version and release.
6.1 The reintegrate option
Supposed you run into:
[jimg@zoe freeform_handler]$ svn merge --reintegrate $svn/branch/xmlrequest/freeform_handler svn: Cannot reintegrate from 'https://scm.opendap.org/svn/branch/xmlrequest/freeform_handler' yet: Some revisions have been merged under it that have not been merged into the reintegration target; merge them first, then retry.
This message likely means that somewhere in the trunk a file was copied or moved. I think. The fix is to do the merge the old way, by hand, as it were. The following example is run in a working copy of the trunk code and the first URL given to merge is the last revision of the trunk that was merged to the branch. The second argument is the branch, which defaults to the HEAD revision. This is essentially what --reintegrate does.
[jimg@zoe netcdf_handler]$ svn merge --dry-run $svn/trunk/netcdf_handler@19627 $svn/branch/xmlrequest/netcdf_handler --- Merging differences between repository URLs into '.': U ncdds.cc U nc_handler.cc U NCUInt32.cc ...
How do you find that 'last merged trunk revision?' By sleuthing. Look at the log for the trunk and/or go to the Trac site and browse the trunk code. If you're lucky you're doing this 'reintegrate merge' (merging a branch to the trunk) just after merging the trunk to the branch to make sure the branch is up to date. In that case the last trunk version merged to the branch will be the current HEAD revision of the trunk and you could just say
svn merge $svn/trunk/netcdf_handler $svn/branch/xmlrequest/netcdf_handler
and leave off the explicit revision number.
Dealing with conflicts in the code:
/** set the structure values to create the FreeForm DB**/ SetUps->user.is_stdin_redirected = 0; SetUps->input_file = FileName; <<<<<<< .working #if 0 // See my comments in ffdds.cc 10/30/08 jhrg #ifdef RSS string iff = find_ancillary_rss_formats(filename); #else string iff = find_ancillary_formats(filename); #endif ======= #ifdef RSS string iff = find_ancillary_rss_formats(filename); #else string iff = find_ancillary_formats(filename); #endif >>>>>>> .merge-right.r19853 char *if_f = new char[iff.length() + 1]; iff.copy(if_f, iff.length()); if_f[iff.length()]='\0'; SetUps->input_format_file = if_f; #endif
In this case the diff doesn't completely make sense, but the first part (.working) is from the working copy and the second part is from the right hand URL given to merge, so it's the 'other' code. Aa I said above, you sometimes have to look around at the various versions to sort out what really should wind up the file. In most cases it's pretty obvious.
6.3 Merging branch to trunk again: Three Way Merge
This is the syntax for performing subsequent branch-to-trunk merges.
It is crucial to this use case for subversion that each and every time you merge a branch back to the trunk that you create a tag of the branch at that time. Then later when you need to merge the branch back to the trunk again (to pickup additional changes that happened on the branch since the last merge) you will use the most recent tag. The syntax for this is described in the svn book in Chapter 4, in the section titled: Merge Syntax: Full Disclosure.
- http://last.tag.url - is the subversion url of the last tag (associated with a merge to the trunk) for the branch in question.
- http://branch.url - is the subversion url of the branch that need to be merged to the trunk.
- local_working_copy_of_trunk - Is a local up to date copy of the trunk.
First make sure it looks like it's going to do what you think it should using the --dry-run option!
If your changes are only to one or two files then --dry-run should tell you that only those are being updated. If you see a bunch of other stuff STOP - you've got something wrong and the result will be a big heap of FAIL.